Category Archives: Planning

The Complicated Financial Life of a US to NZ Expat

Posted on by
2

I recently gathered the information needed to file my New Zealand taxes. This was a multi-week task that required downloading documents from family financial accounts spanning three different continents. It was as exciting as it sounds, and if it were the only tax experience I had to endure each year, it would be bearable. However, as an expatriate (expat) US citizen, I must also file US taxes annually because the US is one of a handful of countries that taxes its citizens no matter where they live. An additional complication is that the New Zealand and US tax years do not match up. Hence, the information I gather for one regime is not complete for the other. All of this leads me to the conclusion that as an expat US military retiree family, we lead a complicated financial life.

Suppose you’re considering becoming an expat, expat retiree, or expat military retiree (like me). In that case, your financial life need not be as complicated as mine. Don’t get me wrong, if you want to be an expat, you are accepting a significant amount of financial friction in your life. However, I’ve logged below several engaging lessons learned from my complicated financial life that should help you navigate that process more efficiently. Those lessons include the importance of paying for expert tax advice, as well as finding a money tracking program that can access all your accounts in their various currencies. There are several more, all of which are worth considering before making that move. Continue reading →

Pensionable Careers: Fed vs. Military Benefits (Part 1)

Posted on by
5

A Word from the Publisher

This post is the first of a two-parter from longtime friend of the blog Chris Pascale. Chris was a US Marine who served in Iraq in the mid-2000s but is now a US federal employee. If you want to know more about him, you can read his short bio at the end of the blog post.

Chris is also a published poet!

Chris writes here in a private capacity, which is good because he has several strong but fact-based opinions on which pathway (federal or military) provides the better retirement benefits value proposition from a “worth vs. worth it“ perspective. I emphasize the term pathway because judging the worthiness of a pensionable career should be more than just an examination of the retirement benefits provided. It should also consider the pros and cons one will experience while working towards those benefits during their career, which is what Chris does.

In that light, Chris clearly believes the federal path is the better one. That’s a critical view to represent since I spend so much time on this blog talking about the advantages of my military retirement benefits. That isn’t to say that Chris doesn’t support those making a career in the military; he simply believes the career and retirement benefits should be more equitable. The remainder of this article and the next explain why. Take it away, Chris! Continue reading →

Life Strikes Back: BrewDog’s Lump Sum Update

Posted on by
3

One great thing about taking a break from blogging is that once you start publishing again, people who missed your regular updates contact you with words of thanks and encouragement. Such was the recent case with BrewDog. You might remember him from Pension Series Part 19, in which I helped him analyze his annuity vs. lump-sum options connected to a small defined benefit pension from a previous employer. He recently sent me a note thanking me again for the help I lent him nearly five years ago (wow, how time flies)! In his polite email, BrewDog also provided an update on his lump-sum decision. Spoiler alert, he took the cash and forwent the annuity.

BrewDog taking the lump sum wasn’t a big surprise. He was leaning in that direction when I initially helped him. However, the ultimate reason why he took the lump-sum and some of the lessons he’s learned since are worth considering. They include the importance of:

  1. making a correct survivorship decision if you take a pension annuity
  2. directing your lump sum into a tax-efficient investment vehicle
  3. having a clear investment strategy for a lump-sum

If nothing else, I encourage everyone to read the first lesson learned. It’s an important one for any pensionable worker who decides to take an annuity over a lump sum because sometimes life intervenes in unfortunate ways. As for the rest of the lessons, they will help guide anyone who’s got a lump-sum decision similar to BrewDog’s. Regardless of whether you take the lump sum, internalizing the points stemming from his choice will help you make a well-informed decision. And, as I’ve pointed out numerous times, helping you make well-informed pension decisions is what this blog is all about! Continue reading →

Put Your (Pension) Money Where Your (House) Mouth Is

Posted on by
6

Permanence and Pension Money

Greetings, long-lost readers! It’s been over a year since I published my last post about my return to work to qualify for a New Zealand residence visa. A lot happened over that time, so much so that a separate update is warranted. However, for this article, the easiest thing to say is that my return-to-work plan … worked! My family and I obtained NZ residence based on my employment in April 2023, I transitioned to part-time work in August 2023, and we bought and moved into a house in December 2023. It was a hectic but ultimately successful year, with few setbacks and much growth. As a result, my family and I feel truly blessed when we wake up to the stunning views each morning at our New Zealand home and are comforted by the permanence it provides. Couple that with the financial stability afforded through our monthly defined benefit (DB) pension money, and we are sitting well indeed.

Pension Money

The view from our new back yard.

The remainder of this post is about some of the concepts I put into action to purchase our house and achieve that permanence. As you may have deduced from the play-on-words in my title, the money from my DB pension played, and will continue to play, a key role in making that happen. As such, there are potential lessons to be learned for anyone with a DB pension playing a central role in their retirement who might also wish to purchase a house.

Continue reading →

FIRE in New Zealand: One Thing a Pension Cannot Buy

Posted on by
5

Here’s an imaginary conversation that’s been playing in my head recently:

      • Almost non-existent long-term reader: “Hey Grumpus, I noticed you haven’t posted any new articles in a while. Is everything OK?”
      • Grumpus: “Thanks for asking, but unfortunately, no, everything is not OK. I’ve been mourning a personal loss.”
      • Almost non-existent long-term reader: “Oh…I’m sorry for your loss. Who are you mourning?”
      • Grumpus:“Not who but what.”
      • Almost non-existent long-term reader: “OK … That’s strange … What are you mourning?”
      • Grumpus:“I’m mourning the death of my defined benefit pension-enabled Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) in New Zealand lifestyle. It died in October 2022, when I returned to full-time work.”
      • Almost non-existent long-term reader: “Oh, I’m sorry to hear that! However, I’m afraid I must report you to the Internet Retirement Police (IRP) that Mr. Money Mustache talks about.”
      • Grumpus: “I understand. I’m now a FIRE imposter. Tell the IRP that I’ll go willingly.”

(Moments later, as the IRP is dragging a defeated Grumpus into the police van)

      • Grumpus: “My first attempt at a FIRE in New Zealand lifestyle is dead. LONG LIVE MY SECOND FIRE IN NEW ZEALAND LIFESTYLE!”
The End of a Short Era

You read that imaginary conversation correctly. My defined benefit pension-enabled FIRE in New Zealand lifestyle only lasted 1 year, 4 months, & 23 days. By FIRE in New Zealand lifestyle, I mean the time I spent in retirement with no GI Bill-sponsored or other full-time work-related income. During that time, my family and I lived in New Zealand, relying solely on the income from my Department of Defense and Veteran’s Administration (VA) pensions. I must admit, with a small amount of pride, we did an excellent job of staying under those spending limits.

Why, then, did I return to full-time work? I did it because a defined benefit (DB) pension cannot buy a New Zealand residence-class visa. And without a resident visa, an immigrant family like mine cannot FIRE in New Zealand. That’s not to say that money can’t buy residence in New Zealand because it most certainly can through an investor visa. However, in the post-pandemic New Zealand immigration system, that potential visa pathway was moved beyond my family’s ability to achieve. As a result, even though I’m guaranteed to earn the same inflation-protected amount of money each month until the day that I die, it wasn’t enough. I found myself at the uncomfortable crossroads of a return-to-work decision around September 2022. Continue reading →

This Is Your Pension On Inflation

Posted on by
1

What do you think will be the Word of the Year for 2022?

My heart says it should be “Ukraine,” but my head says it will be “inflation.”

If I was a betting man, I’d bet with my head.

To be fair, one of the driving factors of 2022’s inflation is Russia’s illegal and immoral war in Ukraine. Specifically, it is the grain and gas shortages caused by the war and the international sanctions against Russia. However, that’s not the only cause of 2022’s inflation problem. It turns out that inflation’s rise in 2022 is a complicated story, one with many villains and few heroes, which also means it may be sticking around for some time. As a result, it’s an excellent time to analyze the vulnerabilities of a pension without an inflation-fighting mechanism. Continue reading →

The Pension Couch: Replacing Pension Income

Posted on by
Reply
Back in Action

I’m back with another edition of the Pension Couch. I produce Pension Couch articles from edited and sanitized exchanges with readers who ask me defined benefit (DB) pension questions. It’s a way for me to create posts with useful pension-related information without the additional work required to write one from scratch. In this edition, I answer a reader’s “what if” question about replacing lost pension income by taking a higher-paying non-pensionable job. As a question, it fits well with this blog’s stay-or-go Golden Albatross theme. Therefore, I believe it’s worth your time.

This article’s request came from a reader who I called Kai. He specifically asked how much he’d need to save and invest at a new non-pensionable job to replace lost annual pension income from his current pensionable job… if he decided to leave six years earlier than planned. On the face of it, that’s a straightforward question. The answer, however, required modeling his retirement savings and investment options and then determining if they could replace the potential lost pension income.

Readers ask me some form of the “replacing pension income” question a lot, which tells me two things. First, many readers have contemplated leaving their often lower-salaried pensionable jobs for higher salaried non-pensionable jobs. Second, many readers also understand these scenarios involve trade-offs connected to their pension’s ultimate value in retirement. But, as just mentioned, mathematically modeling these “what if” questions can be complicated. Fortunately, in this article, I demonstrate how to determine if replacing pension income is feasible without resorting to complex math formulas. Instead, I use a free website and free retirement planning software, which you can easily replicate, should you need to answer the same question. Continue reading →

The Pension Series (Part 30): Pension Maximization

Posted on by
14

Pension Maximization

Helping pensionable workers determine the value of their defined benefit (DB) pension to make well-informed Golden Albatross decisions is the raison d’être for this website. Thus, I write most of my articles for pensionable workers trying to determine whether staying for their DB pension is worth it. However, those aren’t the only articles I write. Although much smaller in number, I also publish articles for pensionable workers who decide to stay. If a unifying theme to those articles exists, it’s pension maximization.

What’s pension maximization? In practical terms, pension maximization ensures your pension’s positive impact in retirement is as significant as possible. You maximize your pension by taking active steps during your pensionable career. My Gap Number, Roth vs. Traditional, buying back years, and pension geoarbitrage articles provide examples of actionable steps pensioners can take. That said, unlike my Golden Albatross-themed articles, I never laid out a framework for pension maximization. In other words, after a worker decides to stay, I never answered the simple “now what?” question.

The remainder of this article, and its follow-on, layout my framework for answering “now what?” I call this framework Grumpus Maximization.

Yes, it’s a somewhat cheesy metaphor. But, Grumpus Maximization is a catchphrase designed to stick, much like the Golden Albatross. Who knows? It might even aid future marketing attempts like printing t-shirts with “Got Pension?” on the front and “Get Maximized @ grumpusmaximus.com” on the back …

That’s not helping, is it? Fine, I’ll sidebar the marketing discussion for now. Continue reading →

Death Binder 2.0: The Pensioner’s Edition

Posted on by
Reply
A New Hope … For Time to Create a Better Death Binder

Young kids fractionalize your free time as a parent, making long-term projects difficult. That may sound ironic coming from an early retiree and pensioner like me, but it’s nonetheless true, especially during the summer holidays. As I pen this post, it’s February, and we’re nearing the end of summer in New Zealand (NZ). The kids recently started their new school year, which is great because my family and I were busy with all the fun things that typify the NZ summer lifestyle for the six preceding weeks. This includes going to the beach, road-tripping, camping, hiking, kayaking, bike riding, summer football (i.e., soccer), and rock jumping into emerald pools of cold mountain river water! Needless to say, all that fun didn’t leave much time for the long-overdue transformation of my original death binder into a pensioner’s death binder. Continue reading →

The Pension Couch: A Lump-Sum Offer Mystery

Posted on by
Reply

As the title of this Pension Couch post suggests, I help solve the mystery behind a lump-sum offer for a reader. I decided to code-name that reader Charleston because I have relatives who live in South Carolina. As with all Pension Couch posts, most of this article is made up of my lightly edited email to Charleston. In that email, I analyzed her two options: either take the lump sum or stick with the pension annuity. The wild card that makes this article different from my other lump-sum articles is that her lump-sum offer was from what’s known as a church pension plan (aka church plan).

I’ve never written about a lump-sum offer from a church plan. Actually, I’ve never written about church pension plans full-stop. Moreover, while I discuss them in this article, I don’t go too deep. I’ve made a note to write a post on church plans for the Pension Series in the future, though, because they’re an important topic. In the meantime, all you need to know is church plans don’t have to abide by the US’s Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). For those of you unfamiliar with ERISA, it is the “federal law that sets minimum standards for most … retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans.”

Since church plans in the US don’t have to follow the federal minimum standards, their inner workings are somewhat opaque. This opacity can create some severe pension safety concerns for plan members. Moreover, it also turns out the lax rules governing church plans impact how these plans can calculate lump-sum offers. Therefore, the mystery in this story isn’t a “who’s done it?” but a “how was it done?” Continue reading →