The Golden Albatross vs. The Insurance Industry (Part 2): Annuity Valuation Case Study

Insurance Annuity Valuation Question

Annuity Valuation

What me worry?

A reader, whom I’ll call Lady J, recently asked me if I could value her future insurance annuity scenarios vs. her current cash-out value. She wanted an annuity valuation done in the same manner as the Pension Lump Sum Case Study I wrote for the Pension Series. The question intrigued me. My initial reaction was, yes, I could. Since a Defined Benefit Pension (DBP) is just another phrase for an annuity; I didn’t think it would prove too hard if she could provide the appropriate details. I told Lady J as much, and she promptly supplied me with details I needed.

Surprisingly, the annuity valuation proved both easier and harder than I initially thought. Easier in the sense that based on the numbers provided by Lady J, my Master Pension Value Calculator spit out an answer to her question in no time. Harder in the sense that once I reviewed the terms of her annuity policy, and the facts surrounding her initial investment, it forced me to ponder numerous “what if’s”. Thus, consider this article in two parts. First, I walk through the facts surrounding Lady J’s situation and the process of annuity valuation. Second, I address a few different issues, both good and bad, I noticed with this annuity. Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 5): Survivorship (Updated)

Substantive Correction

This is an updated version to my article originally posted 04 October 2017. This version includes a substantive correction. The previous version of the article failed to accurately describe all the calculations required when comparing a pension with an inflation-linked Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) to life insurance. I noticed my omission today and reworked the affected paragraphs. I also took the opportunity to clean up some grammar. You will see substantive changes noted in red text. I believe the changes make the comparisons between life insurance and survivorship more competitive.

The incomplete calculations I described in the previous version of my article appeared weighted towards survivorship. That was not my intent. Since the intent of the article changed, and I believe in full disclosure with my readers; I felt this mistake warranted a revision with new publish date.

This is a first for me in the blogging sphere, although in the military we routinely  strive for this level of transparency when an official report, memorandum, or instruction contains a major mistake. The primary purpose for issuing a correction is to prevent anyone from acting on erroneous information. It’s also important that the historical record reflect accurate information. I’ve decided to hold myself to the same standard on this blog.

As a result, I advise anyone who read and used the methods described in the previous version of this article to read this update and adjust your calculations accordingly. While I apologize for the inconvenience, and always strive for 100% accuracy in my articles; I would remind everyone I’m not a professional. Nor am I considering your case specifically. No matter how comfortable you are with your retirement numbers and plan; it’s always best to run your them by a professional like a fee-only Certified Financial Planner who adheres to the fiduciary standard.  Again my apologies.

Survivorship

KJH, we honor the fallen in the Grumpus Maximus family.

Death Sucks

In late Summer 2003, a member of my unit and one of its seasoned mentors was killed in the early days of the Insurgency in Iraq. We were both part of a tight-knit group of young officers that worked and played hard. While I would not have called him a close friend, many in our group did, and I often sought advice and guidance from him. His death was a blow to everyone in our group and the unit as a whole. Nothing was the same after it. Most of us were not prepared mentally and we all took it personally. Each of us dealt with his death in our own way, and I am sad to say it splintered the group in ways I never could’ve foreseen. Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 10): Geoarbitrage and Pensions

Where in the World …

geoarbitrage

… is Grumpus Maximus?

In Part 9 of the Pension Series a reader’s question prompted me to research the interplay between the U.S. Federal tax code and pensions. My reader, Mr. Yankee, wanted to know what options existed to minimize Federal taxes when pension payments started for him and his wife, Mrs. Doodle. I found a few specific instances to defray some Federal tax, but nothing major. Turns out Mr. Yankee already knew the most powerful tax options available to him. What did Mr. Yankee know? He knew that in the U.S., geography mattered when it came to taxes — specifically at the State level.

For my one non-related international reader, it may seem strange, but in the U.S. we tax income more than once. We typically tax it at the Federal and the State level, and sometimes even at the local level. Furthermore, pension payments typically count as income no matter the source. As I chronicled in Part 9 of the Pension Series, everyone who receives a pension is (typically) subjected to Federal tax. However, not every State in the Union taxes income. Nor does every State tax pension payments as income. Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 9): Pensions and U.S. Federal Taxes

***This is an updated article. See Post Script at the bottom***

Today’s topic comes from one of my Facebook group followers.  I recently solicited my Golden Albatross group on subjects to research and write about, and Mr. Yankee responded with the following question:

Has there been discussion of how to shelter your pension benefits from federal tax? When I retire I expect to receive about $60,000 a year from my pension I’d hate to give a large portion of it back to the government.

I told Mr. Yankee I would look into it since I’d yet to conduct an in-depth analysis of pensions and taxes. It’s a bit premature considering the fact that U.S. tax law is undergoing its first major overhaul since the 1980s. Currently, the House and the Senate are working on reconciling their two different bills into one in order to approve and send to the President for signature. However, my research only shows one proposal in the House bill with the potential to impact this conversation in any meaningful way, and I believe I can address it appropriately. If something radical happens in the reconciliation process, I will simply update this article when the dust settles. Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 8): Deciding to Take a Pension Lump Sum

We Interrupt Your Previously Scheduled Program …

Great news! You don’t have to read me waffling on about analyzing your pension lump sum offer this week at GrumpusMaximus.com. I published Part 8 of the Pension Series as a guest post for Darrow Kirkpatrick’s blog, CanIRetireYet.com, so you can read my waffling there instead.  Check it out at the following link.

Darrow’s site is a long time favorite of mine.  It is the one sight, more than any other, that inspired me to make the calculations and determine if early retirement was possible for myself and my family. Avid readers of my blog may already be familiar with his work as I reference it quit a bit. Luckily a mutual friend put Darrow and I in touch, and I now get to consider him a mentor and a friend.  Many thanks to Darrow for providing me the opportunity to write for his site, and gain exposure for the Golden Albatross message and GrumpusMaximus.com.  Darrow does not allow comments on his website, but feel free to post them to this article and let me know what you think.

Enjoy!

— GM

 

The Pension Series (Part 7): How to Create Your Own COLA

St. George’s Thesis

Build Your Own Cola

“Cry — God for Harry! England and Saint George!”

How was your week? Productive I hope.  I spent most of my spare time drafting my pièce de résistance for the Pension Series as a guest post for one of my favorite blogs and bloggers. I’m excited, so stay tuned for the announcement as to when and where you can find it. Unfortunately, it means I’m short an article because I (stupidly) don’t keep any posts in the bank.

However, I am about to let you in on a little blogging secret.  Facebook provides an endless amount of material to write about. As proof of this point, about 10 days ago George, one of my awesome Golden Albatross Facebook Group members, asked the following sizzler of a question related to pensions and inflation-adjusted Cost of Living Allowance (COLA):

Basically, if my pension is say $50k [a year] with no COLA provided by my employer, what do I have to have saved in an IRA to be able to grow my pension with cost of living for the next 30 years? (50k+4%)+4%)+4%)etc. For 30 years…)
Continue reading

An Unintentional Meander Up Grumpy Avenue (Part 3)

It’s OK to Fail

Americans abhor failure, or so we’ve been led to believe. I joined the U.S. military in the late 1990s and can remember the Zero-Defect Mentality the post-Cold War peace dividend bred into our military leaders. While I would like to think the longest-running armed conflict in U.S. history (Afghanistan), and the most controversial since Viet Nam (Iraq), bled our military leadership dry of the Zero-Defect Mentality, I’ve watched it slowly creep back into prominence since 2010.

My current Commanding Officer (CO) is an exception to that trend. He uses a term to describe his willingness to accept failure: Recoverable Training Failure. It essentially means he allows people to learn from their mistakes, as long as those failures are recoverable (i.e., no one died or was seriously injured). He’d rather people fail in a training environment, take the hard lessons learned, apply them, and succeed operationally when it matters most.  It’s a combat veteran’s mentality and is a good leadership philosophy in my opinion.

Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 3): What is Your Pension Worth?

Grumpus Types Too Much

Anybody else exhausted from Part 2 of the Pension Series?  I know I am.  At 3200+ words, it wasn’t concise.  Amongst all those words, you may remember my promise to help you determine your pension’s worth in future posts.  Well, the future is now, or at least partially.  Unlike Part 2, though, I intend to break up the discussion over the next several posts.  How many?  I don’t know yet; at least two, maybe more.  Since calculating your pension’s worth is more of a “how to process”, I hope the articles don’t need to be overly verbose.  I understand people don’t have time to read 3200+ word posts every week, and frankly, I don’t have the time to write them.

Calculating Your Pension’s Worth … Ain’t Like Dusting Crops

In this post, I will examine the three key inputs that determine your pension’s worth.  I will also examine some basic mathematical formulas used to calculate your pension’s value.  I will keep it simple because I am not a math genius by any means (liberal arts major here!), and more than likely you are going to use a pension calculator to make the calculations anyway.  However, you should understand the inputs and formulas because like Han Solo said in Star Wars: A New Hope: Continue reading

The Pension Series (Part 1): Pension Safety

The Grumpy Labourski

I just realized the serendipitous nature of the topic I chose for this Labor Day weekend’s post, which is pension safety.  Of course, for my one international reader, I refer to U.S. Labor Day.  Don’t confuse it with the rest of the world’s International Worker’s (Labour) Day, otherwise known as May Day.  The U.S. celebrates its laboring workers in September due to May Day’s association with the Haymarket Affair and the Communist Party.  There’s no way this Cold War kid would celebrate some Commie Red version of Labor Day.  Of course, now I feel torn between shouting either “WOLVERINES!” or “YeehaaAAAWWW!” in homage to one of the two greatest Cold War movies of all time.  I’ll let you decide which one is laced with more irony. (Grumpus Maximus is an Amazon Associate, see Disclosures for more details.)

Seriously Dude, Wolverines!

Jokes aside, this article marks the start of a new series of posts centered on pensions.  My choice of Labor Day weekend to begin this series, while fitting, was coincidental.  In all honesty, I don’t plan that far in advance.  I decided to write about pensions because I noticed that the blog’s kind of light on pension discussions.  That’s not good for a blog “Where Financial Independence (FI) and Pensions Meet to Create a Better Retired Life”.  Thus, I felt it was time to rectify that oversight. Continue reading

Retirement Planning: How to Calculate Your “Gap Number”

The Retirement Income Gap: What Does It Tell Us?

Many gaps have earned fame or infamy throughout world history. There is the Cumberland Gap that saw many a settler pass through the Appalachians on their way to the Midwest — much to the Native Americans’ chagrin.  There is the Fulda Gap in Europe, where NATO troops stood watch for 40 years during the Cold War, on the lookout for a Warsaw Pact armor attack that never came.  And of course, there is the gap between Madonna’s teeth.

Mind the gap dude. Seriously, get your face out of your phone before you fall on the tracks and ruin everyone’s commute.

However, I want to discuss a completely different type of gap today — the gap between your calculated retirement expenses and the income you expect from your fixed income (i.e., pension and Social Security).  I call this your “Gap Number,” and in this article, I will show you how to calculate it.   For those of you who’ve read my two articles on the GRO2W planning process, you’ve already had a preview of the calculation I used to determine my Gap Number.  For those who’ve yet to read those articles, my equation is:

Gap Number =  (Fixed Expenses + Discretionary Expenses) – (Pension Payments + Social Security)

Mathematically expressed:    G =  E  –  F

Example 1:

($50,000 Fixed Expenses + $25,000 Discretionary Expenses) minus ($40,000 pension + $10,000 Social Security) = $25,000 as the Gap Number

Why do you need to know that?  I am glad you asked.  You need to know your Gap Number so you can calculate how many investments you need to accumulate to safely employ the 4% rule.  This will eliminate the gap between your fixed income and your expected retirement expenses.  For those of you not familiar with The 4% Rule, you can check out JL Collins’s great explanation.  The 4% Rule is an evidence-based financial rule of thumb that allows retirees to safely withdraw up to 4% of their investments annually, with a 96% or higher probability that they won’t run out of money over 30 years with a 50/50 stock-and-bond portfolio.  I may go into the importance of the 4% rule in future posts, but for now, if you are not familiar with it and do not want to read JL Collin’s post, then you will have to trust me.  I swear I am not wearing my tinfoil hat as I type this.

Thermopylae was a gap too, right?

Now, back to the math lesson:  So, once you solve for G (as we did above) you can then plug that number into the 4% Rule’s equation, do a little algebra (and you thought you would never use it again after school! Me neither!), and spit out the total amount you need saved and invested in order to achieve Financial Independence (FI).

Example 2 (building on Example 1):

  • If  $25,000  =  G  (from above)
    • then $25,000 = .04  x  T    (according to the 4% rule)
      • or expressed differently $25,000 / .04  =  T
        • which means  $25,000 / .04  = $625,000

For the purposes of our example, a person who earns $50K in retirement from fixed income but has $75K in annual expenses will need ~$625,000 saved and invested in a 50/50 stock and bond split in order to safely withdraw $25K (4% Rule) so as to bridge their retirement income gap annually — with a low probability of running out of money.  I italicized that last part to remind you that this number is not hard-and-fast but probabilistic.  As in life, there are no absolute guarantees.

It is also important to keep in mind that this number is a current estimate of the amount a person would need to save, and does not account for inflation over the number of years it would take to save that amount.   So if it is going to take a person 20 years to save $625,000, then that person would need to calculate inflation (the typical average is about 3% annually in the US) on $625,000.  There are online inflation calculators that can do this math for you.

Now that you know why determining your gap number is so important, let’s discuss the steps to do so.

Step 1: Determining Expenses in Retirement

As shown above, the first portion in the Gap Number equation is the expenses.  Thus, you need to make an estimate of the amount you will spend in retirement.  Realistically, that cannot be done without determining how much you are currently spending.  Fortunately, I wrote an entire article on the need to track your expenses for just this reason.   If you have not read it, start there, then come back to this article when you are ready to move forward.

For those who’ve already read it, there are a few other things to consider when determining your retirement expenses.  First, you need to consider which expense categories will increase and which will decrease in retirement.  Some of those changes will be a personal decision based on the retirement lifestyle you expect to lead.  For others, there is the universal answer.  For instance, from what I’ve read, expenses usually go down once you stop working full-time. Less commuting, lack of a need for work clothes, and cheaper lunches all play a role.  Some articles say that 80% of pre-retirement expenses is a good estimate for post-retirement expenses. I would rather you be aware of the research and make your own calculations.

To offset the decrease in the cost of living, you should plan for health care expenses to increase over time in retirement.  How fast, and how it should be modeled, are subjects that are much written about on the interwebs. Start googling, and you should find plenty of information.  Or again, head over to some of the websites I’ve previously mentioned, like Darrow Kirkpatrick’s, and you will find many well-thought-out articles on the topic.

That’s going to cost ya …

For US readers, part of that calculation will obviously include healthcare insurance plans. If your plan is currently connected to your work, you need to ensure you’ve investigated your post-retirement options and costs through your state or the federal government’s healthcare insurance market.  They are likely to be much greater, especially if you have a pre-existing condition.  Make sure you pay attention to any changes made to the healthcare system (currently the Affordable Care Act) and remodel your expenses as necessary.

The second consideration regarding retirement expenses is that your tax situation is likely to change, possibly drastically, when you retire. That may end up being a good thing, as you will most likely pay fewer taxes.  However, you need to run the calculations as best you can to determine your tax situation.  You may even want to use an accountant if you are not comfortable doing it yourself.  Despite being comfortable with my tax projections, I am still running my retirement plan by my accountant.

Finally, if you are unfamiliar with the term Geo-Arbitrage as it pertains to retirement, you should probably start researching it. Needless to say, it doesn’t cost the same to live in Southern California as it does to live in Texas or Central America. As with all major decisions in life, there are pluses and minuses to where you choose to live.  Access to free or cheaper medical care may outweigh the need to live in a place with no income tax.  Good public schools might take priority over cheaper housing.  These are personal decisions best worked out within your family, but once made, they can all be modeled to a certain degree of accuracy.  As future military retirees, access to military treatment facilities, commissaries, base exchanges, and state benefits for military retirees all played a role in our decision to choose our three potential retirement locations.

Step 2:  Determine Your Pension Benefits

It took me 16 years to actually look at the cold, hard facts surrounding the retirement benefits I would earn after 20 years of military service. I generally knew the key features of military retirement, but up to that point, I had never looked into the details. The only reason I started was that a co-worker of mine decided to retire and passed on what he had learned to me. It turned out I had many misconceptions about my retirement benefits. So I started to educate myself, but even that process has proven uneven. As recently as last week, I was still learning new facts about insurance and tax effects from various portions of my retirement benefits.

Does it seem odd that someone would work for decades in a job and not bother to investigate their benefits? As it turns out, it is not that odd. I may have been a bit older than most when I started investigating, but the Pew Charitable Trust recently reported that it is quite common for state and local government workers in their 20s and 30s to understand little about their pensions. That understanding seems to improve as the workers crest 40, and as retirement becomes real and tangible. I find that knowledge both enlightening and disappointing.

It appears that the phenomenon is not isolated to state and local government workers either. The 2015 Blue Star Family Report, an annual survey of military families, reported significant concern among military families about financial issues, but low participation rates among active-duty members in DOD- and command-sponsored financial literacy programs. In other words, we, active-duty military members, are worried about our retirement finances but don’t do much to educate ourselves about our benefits and options. The 2015 report also found:

“Respondents indicated that military family retirement planning was complicated by the uncertainty surrounding future benefits and the perception that military families could not afford to save for retirement.”

It’s a good thing that all the Services require separating or retiring members to attend Transition Assistance Programs (TAP). However, those programs are usually provided to personnel within 12 months of retirement or separation, which does not allow for the strategic financial planning that I espouse on this site. Assuming a military member had meandered in their financial journey as I did, but didn’t have the same luck when they finally woke up to the need for a plan, 12 months would leave them with essentially zero time to research and execute a retirement plan.

So with that, can we agree on the need to understand your retirement benefits earlier in your career? Good. How do you do that? Unfortunately, I cannot answer that question with any amount of specificity for anyone outside the military. However, if the information is not available on the interwebs, I would recommend you contact your local Human Resources Department or representative. For those of you in the military, all you need to do is check out the DOD retirement web page. They have calculators and a wide range of resources. Don’t forget to check out the VA page for disability payments as well.

Regardless of where you work, the obvious question you want to answer about your pension benefits is how much you will get paid in retirement. However, there are several other questions you should seek to answer in your research as well. I’ve listed a few below:

  1. When will your pension payments start?
  2. How safe is your pension? Many pensions are under threat due to mismanagement or budgetary pressures at the state and local levels.
  3. If you determine it is not safe, is there a lump sum option?
  4. Assuming an 8% rate of return (without inflation), how does the lump sum’s projected investment return compare to the annual pension payout?
  5. Do your pension payments adjust with the cost of living? If so, how much?
  6. Does your pension provide any other benefits (i.e., medical insurance, life insurance) that would affect your expected retirement expenses calculations?
  7. Is your pension taxable at the Federal or State level? Does that apply to all potential States you might retire to? What about the Social Security tax?
  8. Does your pension have a survivor benefit? If so, how much does it cost? Are those costs tax-deductible?

As you can see, there is a lot to consider when it comes to pensions and retirement benefits. It may seem overwhelming at first, but trust me, as you whittle down the answers, you will get to a suitable number you can plug into your planning calculations.

 

Keep whittling

Step Three: Social Security

Can you rely on Social Security to be there when you retire? It is another much-debated question in the blogosphere. Some say yes, some say no, and some say partially, depending on your age. Others argue that some of it may be there, but you are safer making your retirement calculations without relying on it. Honestly, I do not have an answer. There are problems with Social Security that must be addressed for everyone to receive 100% of their benefits. Whether they will be given the current state of US politics, I don’t know. If Social Security is fixed, it will affect taxes, requiring us to redo our retirement calculations. If it is not fixed, you will need to use your best judgment about how much you expect to receive by the time you reach Social Security age.

I realize younger generations, social media is akin to a security blanket but I was speaking of something different.

I can tell you what I did for my Social Security retirement calculations. Based on my age (early 40s) and research, I assumed that my wife and I would receive approximately 75% of our Social Security benefits at age 70. Do my calculations work without Social Security? Not all of them. In fact, very few of my retirement scenarios work without some form of Social Security kicking in at age 70. Is that risky? Potentially. However, I ran the numbers through numerous calculators, and we can get by with a high probability of success with as little as 20% of the Social Security owed to us. That is a risk I am willing to take.

There are several other Social Security considerations worth noting for your calculations. One of them is when you plan to start your distributions. Currently, the full (100%) Social Security distribution point for most people is 67 years old. You can delay up to 70 years and earn 8% more on your total distribution for each year you delay. Conversely, people can start receiving their Social Security benefits as early as age 62. When they do, they are choosing to receive a reduced amount for life by upwards of 25%. Strategies for when to start distributions usually center on your projected longevity based on family and medical history. However, the issues surrounding the stability of Social Security may begin to trump (no pun intended) longevity considerations in the future.

If you are still married when your Social Security point rolls around: congratulations! However, you will need to consider the best strategy for you and your spouse. If your spouse worked a full career, it probably makes more sense for each of you to take what you are owed from your separate pots. However, a spouse is also entitled to half of the other spouse’s payment, in lieu of using their own pot. This rule was created for homemakers, but currently, all spouses are eligible. So if half payments from the larger breadwinner’s Social Security pot are more than a full payment from the smaller breadwinner’s pot, it obviously makes more sense to take the larger amount.

Alas, this section was not meant as a full-blown review of Social Security. Since so many FI bloggers and financial experts dive deep into Social Security, I just wanted to give you a taste of the many considerations when calculating your fixed income for your Gap’s mathematical model. I would encourage you to log onto the Social Security Administration’s website if you have never done so. Take a look not only at current projections for your payments but also at information on the Social Security Trust Fund’s viability. Good luck with this complicated topic.

Step Four:  Putting It All Together

Hidy Ho Campers. Time to glue everything together.

OK, we’ve talked generally about what your Gap Number tells you and what you can do with it. We then discussed how to determine each subcomponent of the equation. Just to review, though, remember you calculate your Gap Number by:

Gap Number = (Fixed Expenses + Discretionary Expenses) – (Pension + Social Security Payments)

Mathematically expressed, it looks like: G = E – F

Where G is the Gap Number, E is your annual expense, and F is your annual fixed income.

The most important thing your Gap Number gives you is the crucial value to divide by .04 in order to calculate the total amount of money you need saved and invested in order to safely employ the 4% rule. Mathematically expressed, it looks like:

T = G / .04

Where T is the total amount of money you need saved and invested, G is your Gap Number, and .04 is the decimal equivalent of 4%.

It’s worth noting that these equations are not exclusive to pension and social security inputs. You could have rental, annuity, and/or dividend income (just to name a few) as inputs and still use the Gap equation to calculate your Gap Number. All you essentially need to know is your monthly or annual expenses and income to solve for G. Once you know G, you can solve for T. Once you know T, you can start running tests through any number of high-powered retirement calculators to test its feasibility. Knowing whether T is viable can be powerful, as it technically represents your FI point.‎

I say technically for several reasons. One, if you used fixed income in your equation, then you obviously need to make it to the point where you are eligible to receive it. Or have a plan to bridge until that point with other income opportunities. Two, and more importantly, you must remember that these numbers are based on your best estimates of the future and the probabilistic math behind the 4% Rule. Given that no one can predict the future, and that probabilities are not certainties, I urge you not to fall in love with any one number. Use your numbers as planning tools and update your calculations as new data becomes available or your life changes. If you do that, I have no doubt you will succeed.